HomeMy WebLinkAbout87-2719ORDINANCE NO. 87-2719
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 82-2478 AND THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF PLAINVIEW SO AS TO MAKE THE FOLLOWING
CHANGES:
ZONE CASE NO. 552:
Request of Mrs. Doris Lisman for rezoning Lots 13 and 14, Block 1,
Curtis Subdivision, from a R-2 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning
District to a C.R.D. (Commercial Retail) Zoning District for
commercial uses and located at 610 South Date.
WHEREAS, the proposed change in Zoning Districts as hereinafter made
has been duly presented to the Planning and Zoning _Commission for its
recommendation which was received by the City Council, and after due
consideration, the City Council of the City of Plainview finds that
for the orderly growth of the City making the proposed change as
hereinafter set out will be in the public interest which creates an
emergency; and,
WHEREAS, all conditions precedent required by law for a valid
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and Map, have been fully complied
with, as well as giving notices provided by Article 1011F Vernon's
Annotated Civil Statutes - Amended, 1953, and notice was duly
published in the Plainview Daily Herald more than fifteen (15) days
prior to the date of the Public Hearing according to said notice was
duly held in the City Council Room of the City Hall, Plainview,
Texas, at which time persons appeared in support of the proposal;
and after said hearing, it was by the City Council determined that
it would be in the public interest due to changed conditions, that
the Zoning Ordinance and the Zoning Map be amended in the manner
hereinafter set forth in the body of this Ordinance; NOW, THEREFORE;
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLAINVIEW:
SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 82-2478 and the Official Zoning Map be
and the same are hereby amended as follows, to-wit:
ZONE CASE NO. 552:
Rezoning Lots 13 and 14, Block 1, Curtis Subdivision, from a R-2
(Single-Family Residential) Zoning District to a C.R.D. (Commercial
Retail) Zoning District for commercial uses and located at 610 South
Date.
City of Plainview, Hale County, Texas, from an R-2 (Single-Family
Residential) Zoning District to a C.R.D. (Commercial Retail) Zoning
District. From the date of this Ordinance, said lot, tract and
parcel of land described shall be and hereby be changed to the Zoning
District indicated and the official Map is amended in accordance
herewith.
1 of 2
: ' 816
SECTION 2. A notice that a public hearing shall be held in the
Council Chamber of the City Hall in Plainview, Texas, at 7:30 P.M.,
on the 22nd day of September, 1987, to permit the public to be heard
prior to consideration of this Ordinance was published in the
Plainview Daily Herald, a daily newspaper of general circulation in
the City of Plainview, Texas, said publication being more than
fifteen (15) days prior to the time designated for said hearing.
PASSED ON FIRST READING this, the 22nd day of September, 1987.
PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING this, the 13th day of October,
1987.
E.V. RIDLEHUBER, Mayor
ATTEST:
~v , ' y Secretary
APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
MIKE MCDONOUGH, Director ~f Municipal Services
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DAVID BLACKBURN, Assistant City Attorney
2 of 2
ZONE CASE NO. 552
o !T o
~ ~,D O
CRD
SIXTH
· ,,. ,c,..~ E V~>'' NTH 'STREET
.
EIGHTH . ' STREET
'NINTH STREET ~11'~_ ~
CRD
CGB
Lots 13 & 14, Block1 Curtis Subdivision
610 South Date
CHECK SHEET FOR ZONING CASES
ZONE CASE NOw 552
There must be compelling reasons for any zoning amendment which are substantially related
to the public welfare and necessity~ It is not sufficient that an applicant for an amend-
ment to the Zoning Ordinance merely show that there is no neighborhood objection-to a re-
quest amendment; nor is it sufficient that an applicant show that the amendment would'en-
able him to gain a greater profit or income from his property.
Every zoning amendment should be analyzed with regard to ~e following:
A. COMPREHENSIVENESS:
Bo
Ce
Is change contrary toestablished land use pattern?
Would change create an isolated district unrelated
to similar'districts, i'.e., is this "spot Zoning"?
Would change alter the population density pattern
and thereby increase'the load on public facilities'
(schools, sewers, or streets)?
Are'present district boundaries illogically drawn
in relation to existing conditions?
CHANGED CONDITIONS.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1. Have the basic land use conditions been changed?
2. Has development of area'been contrary to exist-.
ing regulations?
PUBLIC WELFARE:
Will 'chan'ge'a'aversely influence living ~onditions
in the neighborhood?
Will change create-or excessively increase
traffic congestion?
W~ll change seriously reduce the light and air to
adjacent area?
Will change adversely affect property values in
adjacent area?
Will change be a deterrent to the improvement or
development of adjacent area?
Will change constitute a grant of a special
privilege to an indi'vidual as contrasted to the
general welfare?
REASONABLENESS:
? : East side of Date zoned Comm.
Noo- Across from Commercial proper'
No - Property is developed
No
.No - Property was a. non c6nforming
use
No - See' #C-1
No.- See #¢~1
No - See #C-1
No - See #C-1
? - Will be an encroachment into
into R Zone
1. Are there substantial reasons why the property
cannot be used in accord with existing zoning?
2. Is the change requested out of scale with the
needs of the neighborhood or the City?
3. Is it impossible to find adequate sites for the
proposed use in district permitting such use?
The past and proposed uses of the
property are not permitted R zones
The past and proposed uses are not
pprmitmd in R 7onmg
No
No - But property has been previ{]:;
previously deveToped as:commercial