HomeMy WebLinkAbout03.28.2011 BA Variance Findings • •
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
VARIANCE FINDINGS
APPELLANT: Alfredo and Trinidad Saucedo BA 1611 DATE OF HEARING: March 28, 2011
The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things,
the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working
In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the
following findings:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is
sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to
lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the
strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such
land or buildings; and,
2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently
Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and,
3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance
as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and,
4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in
unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting
such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done.
5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance:
A. BA Case # 1611 The request of Alfredo and Trinidad Saucedo for a variance of twenty -five (25) feet of
the required twenty -five (25) foot front setback and five (5) feet of the required five (5) foot side setback
to build a 24' X 30' oversized carport as stated in Section 34 of the City of Plainview Zoning Ordinance
in an R -2 Zoning District and being NLSL PLV BLK23 S40' -14 N15' -15, Plainview, Hale County,
Texas, the same being 1614 Independence.
B. All carports must have an impermeable surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway within 6
months of approval of the variance.
/ UU / / //!! C �� hairman
,7P "e"
Board Member / Board Member
E3oard tuber Board Member
• •
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
VARIANCE FINDINGS
APPELLANT: Robert Martinez BA 1610 DATE OF HEARING: March 28, 2011
The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things,
the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working
In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the
following findings:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is
sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to
lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the
strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such
land or buildings; and,
2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently
Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and,
3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance
as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and,
4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in
unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting
such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done.
5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance:
A. BA Case # 1610 The request of Robert Martinez for a variance of sixteen (16) feet of the required
twenty -five (25) foot front setback and two (2) feet of the required five (5) foot side setback to build a
20' X 18'carport as stated in Section 34 of the City of Plainview Zoning Ordinance in an R -2 Zoning
District and being Villa West Lot 31 Unit 1, Plainview, Hale County, Texas, the same being 4117 Villa
Drive.
B. All carports must have an impermeable surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway within 6
months of approval of the variance.
✓ Chairman
tf /(( ' �'L`
Board Member Board Member
Board ember Board Member