Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09.27.2010 BA Variance Findings BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT VARIANCE FINDINGS APPELLANT: Marissa Amador BA 1602 DATE OF HEARING: September 27, 2010 The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things, the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the following findings: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such land or buildings, and, 2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and, 3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and, 4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done. 5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance: a) BA Case # 1602 The request of Marissa Amador for a variance of (thirty) 30 feet of the required thirty (30) foot front setback and ten (10) feet of the required ten (10) foot side setback to build a 24'X 24' carport as stated in Section 34 of the City of Plainview Zoning Ordinance in an (R -1) Zoning District and being Schoolview Block 1, N27.5 of Lot 13, Lot 14, Plainview, Hale County, Texas, the same being 1514 Utica. b) All carports must have an impermeable surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway within 6 months of approval of the variance. • 4 74- " -- Chairman 1, Board Member Board Member Board Member • . rd Member BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT VARIANCE FINDINGS APPELLANT: Ozette Lopez BA 1603 DATE OF HEARING: September 27, 2010 The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things, the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the following findings: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such land or buildings; and, 2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and, 3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and, 4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done. 5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance: a) BA Case # 1603 The request of Ozette Lopez for a variance of (eight) 8 feet of the required (eight) 8 foot side setback to build a 12'X 34' oversized carport as stated in Section 34 of the City of Plainview Zoning Ordinance in an (R -1) Zoning District and being Day Block 2, Lot 18, Plainview, Hale County, Texas, the same being 1514 Dallas. b) All carports must have an impermeable surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway within 6 months of approval of the variance. Chairman r e Board Member Board Member /f Board Member Board M 1 `J ��J