Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07.26.2010 BA Variance Findings • • BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT VARIANCE FINDINGS APPELLANT: Freddy Cate BA 1598 DATE OF HEARING: July 26, 2010 The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things, the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the following findings: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such land or buildings; and, 2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and, 3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and, 4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done. 5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance: a) BA Case # 1589 The request of Freddy Cate for a variance of twenty -four (24) feet of the required twenty -five (25) foot front setback and five (5) feet of the required five (5) foot side setback to build a 19'X 24' carport as stated in Section 34 of the City of Plainview Zoning Ordinance in a (R -2) Single Family Zoning District and being Montrose Addition Block 3, Lot 16, Plainview, Hale County, Texas, the same being 604 W. 22 " b) All carports must have an impermeable surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway within 6 months of approval of the variance. �✓ Chairman Bard Member Board Member /7/ /,/, Board Member Board Member • BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT • VARIANCE FINDINGS APPELLANT: Oscar Longoria BA 1599 DATE OF HEARING: July 26, 2010 The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things, the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the following findings: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such land or buildings; and, 2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and, 3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and, 4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done. 5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance: a) BA Case # 1599 The request of Oscar Longoria for a variance of twenty (20) feet of the required twenty -five (25) foot front setback and five (5) feet of the required five (5) foot side setback to build a 12'X 21' carport as stated in Section 34 of the City of Plainview Zoning Ordinance in a (R -2) Single Family Zoning District and being Highland Addition Block 74, Lot 1, Plainview, Hale County, Texas, t he same being 1507 Milwaukee. b) All carports must have an impermeable surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway within 6 months of approval of the variance. Chairman � L Bd Member Board Member / ard Member Board Member . • BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT VARIANCE FINDINGS APPELLANT: Aleiandra Figueroa BA 1600 DATE OF HEARING: July 26, 2010 The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things, the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the following findings: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such land or buildings; and, 2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and, 3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and, 4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done. 5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance: a) BA Case # 1600 The request of Alejandra Figueroa for a variance of twenty four (24) feet of the required thirty (30) foot front setback and eight (8) feet of the required eight (8) foot side setback to build a 24' X 24' carport as stated in Section 34 of the City of Plainview Zoning Ordinance in an (R -1) Single Family Zoning District and being Brandes Addition Block 4, S 40' Lot 12, N 20' Lot 13, Plainview, Hale County, Texas, the same being 807 Borger. b) All carports must have an impermeable surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway within 6 months of approval of the variance. ✓✓ Chairman ss Bo d Member Board Memb Board Member Board Member