Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09.28.2009 BA Variance Findings BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT VARIANCE FINDINGS APPELLANT: D J Carrasco BA 1584 DATE OF HEARING: September 28, 2009 The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things, the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the following findings: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such land or buildings; and, 2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and, 3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and, 4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done. 5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance: a) BA Case # 1584 The request of Demetrio J Carrasco for a variance of twelve (12) feet of the required thirty (30) foot front setback as stated in Section 34 of the City of Plainview Zoning Ordinance to construct a 17'X24' carport in the front setback in a Single Family Residential (R -1) Zoning District, and being Lot 7 Block 6 of the Country Club Addition, Plainview, Hale County, Texas, the same being 305 Juanita. b) All carports must have an impermeable surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway within 6 months of approval of the variance. ,Chatrman J oard Member $oard Member 11 d Board Member Board Member BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT VARIANCE FINDINGS APPELLANT: Larry Gould BA 1583 DATE OF HEARING: September 28, 2009 The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things, the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the following findings: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such land or buildings; and, 2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and, 3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and, 4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done. 5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance: a) BA Case # 1583 The request of Larry Gould for a variance of five (5) feet of the required five (5) foot side setback as stated in Section 34 of the City of Plainview Zoning Ordinance to construct a 12'X24' carport in the side setback in a Single Family Residential (R -2) Zoning District, and being Lots 10 -11 Block 2, Kersh Addition, Plainview, Hale County, Texas, the same being 306 SW 8`". b) All carports must have an impermeable surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway within 6 months of approval of the variance. Chairman ,�� Board Member Boa • e ber .04 Board Member Board Member BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT VARIANCE FINDINGS APPELLANT: Lazaro Perez, Jr. BA 1582 DATE OF HEARING: September 28, 2009 The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things, the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the following findings: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such land or buildings; and, 2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and, 3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and, 4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done. 5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance: a) BA Case # 1582 The request of Lazaro Perez Jr. for a variance of nineteen and one half feet (19 -1/2) feet of the required twenty-five (25) foot front setback as stated in Section 34 of the City of Plainview Zoning Ordinance to construct a 20'X24' carport into the front setback in a Single Family Residential (R -2) Zoning District, and being Lot 3, Block 2, Titus Addition, Plainview, Hale County, Texas, the same being 704 W. 26 b) All carports must have an impermeable surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway within 6 months of approval of the variance. 1W Chairman l 7 /; 7 Board Member board Member 11 ,L, Board Member Board Member