HomeMy WebLinkAbout05.24.2010 BA Variance Findings BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
VARIANCE FINDINGS
APPELLANT: Martina Torres BA 1589 DATE OF HEARING: May 24, 2010
The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things,
the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working
In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the
following findings:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is
sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to
lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the
strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such
land or buildings; and,
2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently
Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and,
3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance
as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and,
4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in
unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting
such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done.
5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance:
a) BA Case # 1589 The request of Martina Torres for a variance of thirty (30) feet of the required thirty -
five (35) foot front setback and twenty -five (25) feet of the required twenty -five (25) foot side setback to
build an 18'X 21' carport as stated in Section 34 of the City of Plainview Zoning Ordinance in a Multi -
Family (MF -1) Zoning District and being Highland Addition Block 1, W10' Lot 7, Lot 8, Plainview, Hale
County, Texas, the same being 405 W. 1 lth
b) All carports must have an impermeable surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway within 6
months of approval of the variance.
Chairman
( Board Member oar�ber
A /I/L/ t-1A,"--14/1--)
'Board Member Board Mem er
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
VARIANCE FINDINGS
APPELLANT: Ofelia Hernandez BA 1594 DATE OF HEARING: May 24, 2010
The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things,
the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working
In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the
following findings:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is
sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to
lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the
strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such
land or buildings; and,
2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently
Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and,
3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance
as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and,
4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in
unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting
such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done.
5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance:
a) BA Case # 1594 The request of Ofelia Hernandez for a variance of twenty (20) feet of the required
twenty -five (25) foot front setback and five (5) feet of the required five (5) foot side setback to build a
20' X 20' carport as stated in Section 34 of the City of Plainview Zoning Ordinance in a Single Family
Residential (R -2) Zoning District and being Highland Block 48 Lot 3, Plainview, Hale County, Texas,
the same being 1311 Kokomo.
b) All carports must have an impermeable surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway within
6 months of approval of the variance.
` et -
hairman
14cDa.,02acif)
Board Member Board Member
071•1, � A
Board Membe Board Memb r
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
VARIANCE FINDINGS
APPELLANT: Randy Walzier BA 1595 DATE OF HEARING: May 24, 2010
The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things,
the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working
In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the
following findings:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is
sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to
lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the
strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such
land or buildings; and,
2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently
Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and,
3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance
as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and,
4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in
unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting
such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done.
5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance:
a) BA Case # 1595 The request of Randy Walzier for a variance of five (5) feet of the required five (5)
foot side setback to build a 20' X 22' carport as stated in Section 34 of the City of Plainview Zoning
Ordinance in a Single Family Residential (R -2) Zoning District and being Gardenville Block 4 Lot 2,
Plainview, Hale County, Texas, the same being 2521 Trinity.
b) All carports must have an impermeable surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway within
6 months of approval of the variance.
hairman
C.) Board Member Member k '" ' V�
azd
Bsard Member Board ember
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
VARIANCE FINDINGS
APPELLANT: Graciano Saucedo BA 1596 DATE OF HEARING: May 24, 2010
The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things,
the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working
In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the
following findings:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is
sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to
lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the
strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such
land or buildings; and,
2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently
Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and,
3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance
as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and,
4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in
unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting
such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done.
5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance:
a) BA Case 1596 The request of Graciano Saucedo for a variance of ten and one half (10 %2) feet of the
required twenty -five (25) foot front setback to build a 6' X 8' porch as stated in Section 34 of the City of
Plainview Zoning Ordinance in a Single Family Residential (R -2) Zoning District and being Houston
Block 2 Lot 4, Plainview, Hale County, Texas, the same being 407 W. 20th.
C hairman
1 5 LI71
Board Member Board Member
_
A rtrti,
oard Member " Board Member
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
VARIANCE FINDINGS
APPELLANT: Richard Adame BA 1597 DATE OF HEARING: May 24, 2010
The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things,
the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working
In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the
following findings:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is
sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to
lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the
strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such
land or buildings; and,
2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently
Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and,
3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance
as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and,
4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in
unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting
such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done.
5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance:
a) BA 1597 The request of Richard Adame for a variance of four (4) feet of the required thirty (30) foot
front set back and eight feet (8) of the required eight (8) foot side setback to build an 11' X 33'
oversized carport, and a variance of four (4) feet of the required thirty (30) foot front set back to build a
5'6" X 27'6" covered porch attached to the carport as stated in Section 34 of the City of Plainview
Zoning Ordinance in a Single Family Residential (R -1) Zoning District and being Schoolview Block 2
Lot 2, Plainview, Hale County, Texas, the same being 1423 Smythe.
b) All carports must have an impermeable surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway within
6 months of approval of the variance.
Chairman
/1 ,
Board Member Board Member
M
Board Member Board Member `�� %~2