HomeMy WebLinkAbout09.22.2008 BA Variance Findings BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
VARIANCE FINDINGS
APPELLANT: Floyd & Linda Waters CASE NO: BA 1561 DATE OF HEARING: September 22, 2008
The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things,
the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working
In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the
following findings:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is
sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to
lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the
strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such
land or buildings; and,
2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently
Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and,
3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance
as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and,
4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in
unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting
such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done.
5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance:
1. 203 S. Garland Street: variance of four (4) feet of the required thirty (30) foot front setback to
construct a porch extension into the front setback
ji
r
Chairman
Board Member �� Z� ` Board Member
,11 ct.,Ax3_&)jc_ A \\,
- -- /C ' ^ - -
oard Member J ' Board Member
1111111111111111111 _,
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
VARIANCE FINDINGS
APPELLANT: John Rodgers CASE NO: BA 1562 DATE OF HEARING: September 22, 2008
The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things,
the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working
In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinity of such property, and makes the
following findings:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is
sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such land or buildings and do not apply generally to
lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that said circumstances or conditions are such that the
strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of such
land or buildings; and,
2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or substantially or permanently
Injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or neighborhood in which the property is located; and,
3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the reasonable use of the land or building and that the variance
as granted by the Board is the minimum variance that will accomplish this purpose; and,
4. The literal enforcement and strict application of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance will result in
unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the general provisions and intent of such ordinance and that in granting
such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be preserved and substantial justice done.
5. The following conditions are necessary to secure substantially the purpose and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance:
1. 205 N.E. Alpine Street: variance of twenty -five (25) feet of the required twenty -five (25) foot front
setback and one (1) foot of the required five (5) foot side setback to construct a 20'X19' carport in
the front setback
2. All carports must have an impermeable surface (i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway
within 6 months of approval of the variance.
`� : ga t 0---
Chairman
2,„- j f ,
44y %,/,,e
Board Member :2.�.�i i� ms
Board Member
a : ..
1)
;✓
,,,,,,N y
}� U
Board Member Board Member u
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
VARIANCE FINDINGS
APPELLANT: Ron Watts CASE NO: BA 1563 DATE OF HEARING: September 22, 2008
The undersigned, as a member of the Zoning Board of Adjustment has taken into account, among other things,
the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the num. . - ons residing or working
In such buildings or upon such land and traffic conditions in the vicinit . uch . lerty, and makes the
following findings:
1. There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the 1. sr butldin x ;, or whi. -the variance is
sought, which circumstances or conditions are peculiar to such 1. 4.r b . , ings . d . of ap. generally to
lands or buildings in the same zone or neighborhood, and that s 4 ch.. ' i St. ;- s o `. one ∎ ns ar- ch that the
strict application of the provisions of this ordinance would depriv he �
.lica : , t rea able se of such
land or buildings; and,
2. The granting of such variance will not be detrimen { • t "... • lic i -1fa ' •r s antra ; . permanently
Injurious to the property or improvements in such zo . r nei _ bob.. eh ° pr `= la located; and,
3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the re. able use o - •r b + ing , `'d that the variance
as granted by the Board is the minimum varian• "' ill om. 'sh t .. p • .' `,,, • an. '
4. The literal enforcement and strict appl y .,,An o • °< o' of Y ., e Zoni 1 rdinance will result in
unnecessary hardship inconsistent with the gene , •rovisi. a 'ntent of s h ordinance and that in granting
such variance the spirit of the ordinance will be prey ed an. es •' ial ju• 'c one.
5. The following conditions are necessary to secu� subs . 11 `' - . e .4 . . se and intent of the Zoning
Ordinance:
1. 23402 Grandview: variance of e . , feet oft ' ired twenty -five (25) foot front setback
to construct a 25'X25'6" ca s o the t setback
2. All carports ust hay i 1 I e j, le s , i.e. concrete, asphalt) applied to the driveway
within 6 months of lip , o o I e 1,
Chairman
s
,.. .2"" C-7,, -3.--- ' )
tsG
Board Member - Board Member
J
l arb Member Board Member I